AIDS 2010: An Embargo Gone Bust
Two more days to go at AIDS 2010. Hundreds of stories to report. And countless others to tell in the months ahead, as we return to our newsrooms around the world.
We are collecting your work and will publish on the Helpdesk in the coming days. Send me your links at douglas@nationalpress.org. If you work is not in English, just include a short paragraph (in English) about the story.
There are plenty of themes to explore, people to interview and scores of political debates worthy of attention. But the truth is conferences of this scale rarely produce "breaking" news. So there was quite a bit of anticipation about the CAPRISA microbicide trial. The buzz surrounding its release was unavoidable. In fact, I emailed my editor at NPR just to check myself. Was I getting too caught up in the hype? Should I file a story or stick to the news spots?
As it turns out, I didn't have much of a choice. Monday evening, the Financial Times broke the embargo, which was set for Tuesday at 1pm. The journal Science then released the embargo, early. Long story short, dozens of journalists were left scrambling to beat the news cycle. For reporters based in Europe, it was especially challenging because the bust occurred after many papers were already on the press.
Today, AIDS 2010 put out a statement blasting the Financial Times for breaking the embargo:
"To date, the International AIDS Conference has operated in a spirit of trust, with an understanding of the ethical obligations of journalists with respect to the conference's abstract and media embargo policy. We were therefore disappointed by the actions of the Financial Times, which went against the spirit of the conference embargo policy..."
Conference organizers say they will launch a formal complaint with the newspaper.
Did the reporter, Andrew Jack, intentionally break the embargo? That has yet to be determined or made public, to my knowledge. Without having spoken to Jack, it seems right to offer the benefit of doubt. Possibly it was a case of miscommunication ..?
Even so, the incident raises some important questions about the very notion of an embargo policy. Let us know what you think.
Have you ever considered defying an embargo because you felt obligated as a journalist?
How did this situation affect the way you reported the story?

